Inventário Deadline in Brazil and ITCMD Late Penalties, State by State

Somewhere between the funeral and the first family video call, someone mentions “the sixty days”. Your mother died in Belo Horizonte, or your grandfather in Recife, or your uncle in Campinas, and a cousin who “knows a lawyer” says the estate must be opened within sixty days or there is a fine. You live in Boston or Dublin. You do not have a CPF, a power of attorney, or an apostilled birth certificate. The sixty days are already half gone.

The cousin is roughly right — and wrong in ways that matter. There is a deadline. It comes from the national procedural code, and it says two months, not sixty days. It carries no fine of its own. The fine — where there is one — comes from the tax law of the state that taxes the estate, and those laws differ so widely that the same delay costs 20% of the tax in one state and nothing in the state next door.

This guide turns on one distinction: the procedural deadline is national; the penalty is state law. Once that is clear, the questions an heir abroad actually needs answered become tractable — what counts as “opening”, which state’s rule applies, how big the surcharge is, whether it can be reduced, and what to do when the window has already closed.

This is educational content prepared by the ZS Advogados Associados team for heirs living outside Brazil — children, spouses, and grandchildren of people who died with assets in Brazil — and for Brazilian families coordinating an estate across borders. It complements our guides on inheriting Brazilian property as a non-resident heir, the ITCMD and the 2027 reform, and how estates are divided among heirs. If you want to size the tax before reading the penalty rules, our ITCMD calculator gives a first estimate by state.

What does the law actually say about the inventário deadline?

The rule is article 611 of the Código de Processo Civil (Lei 13.105/2015). In substance, it provides that the inventário and partition proceeding should be opened within 2 months, counted from the opening of the succession — that is, from the death (Código Civil, art. 1.784) — and concluded within the following 12 months, and that the judge may extend both periods, on the court’s own initiative or on a party’s request. The article, unamended since 2015, reads in full: “O processo de inventário e de partilha deve ser instaurado dentro de 2 (dois) meses, a contar da abertura da sucessão, ultimando-se nos 12 (doze) meses subsequentes, podendo o juiz prorrogar esses prazos, de ofício ou a requerimento de parte.”

Three things follow from the text that families routinely miss:

• It says months, not days. The “60 days” everyone quotes is the state tax law’s version of the same window (São Paulo’s statute, for instance, says 60 days). The two usually coincide, but a February death can make “2 months” and “60 days” fall on different dates. Where they diverge, the state’s own wording governs the state’s own penalty.
• It has no procedural sanction. Nothing in the CPC voids a late filing, bars a late heir, or fines anyone. A proceeding opened in month five is as valid as one opened in week one. The Code’s deadline is a directive to move, not a bar.
• The 12-month conclusion deadline is routinely extended. Judges extend it as a matter of course in complex or contested estates. Some states, however, tie a payment clock to the same period, which is where the conclusion deadline quietly regains teeth (see below).

The reason the opening deadline nonetheless matters is that the states — which own the inheritance tax — decided to enforce it fiscally. The Supreme Court settled the constitutionality of that decision decades ago: Súmula 542 of the STF (1969) holds, in its own words, that “não é inconstitucional a multa instituída pelo Estado-Membro, como sanção pelo retardamento do início ou da ultimação do inventário.”

Legal basis: the 2-month opening and 12-month conclusion directive is art. 611 do Código de Processo Civil (Lei nº 13.105/2015); the succession opens at death under art. 1.784 do Código Civil (Lei nº 10.406/2002); state authority to fine late opening is confirmed by Súmula nº 542 do Supremo Tribunal Federal.

Why are the penalties different in every state?

Because the ITCMD — the Imposto sobre Transmissão Causa Mortis e Doação — is a state tax (Constitution, art. 155, I). Each of the 26 states and the Federal District legislates its own rate, base, exemptions, payment deadline, interest, and penalties. The national general rules recently enacted in LC 227/2026 harmonise the tax base and mandate progressive rates, but its ITCMD book contains no penalty for opening an estate late — the infraction and penalty chapters of that Law govern the IBS and the CBS, not the ITCMD. Penalty schedules therefore remain a matter for each state’s own statute. LC 227/2026 does, however, confirm at art. 148, §3 that the taxable event on death occurs “independentemente da instauração de inventário ou arrolamento, judicial ou extrajudicial” — the tax is triggered by the death, not by the filing.

Which state’s law applies to your estate? For real property, the state where the property is located. For movable assets, bank balances, shares, and receivables, the connecting factor has historically been the state where the estate proceeding is conducted — normally the deceased’s last domicile — with LC 227/2026, art. 159, I now settling it: the state of the deceased’s domicile where the de cujus was domiciled in Brazil, and the state where the successor is domiciled where the de cujus was domiciled abroad; art. 159, III sends the tax to the state where the assets sit in Brazil when transferor and recipient are both abroad. Real property follows its own location (art. 158). An estate with an apartment in São Paulo and a farm in Goiás can therefore be exposed to two penalty regimes on two different clocks. Our guide on the ITCMD and the 2027 reform covers the allocation rules; here we stay with the penalties.

Legal basis: the ITCMD is art. 155, I, of the Constitution, as amended by Emenda Constitucional nº 132/2023; national general rules, including domicile-abroad allocation, are in Lei Complementar nº 227/2026; penalty schedules remain in each state’s ITCMD statute.

What does “opening” the inventário mean — and when does the clock stop?

This is the question on which most disputes about the surcharge actually turn, and the answer is state-specific.

• Judicial estates. The clock is stopped by filing the petição inicial (the opening petition) in court. It does not matter that documents are incomplete or that the inventariante has not yet been appointed; the protocol date is the date. This is why “open first, perfect later” is sound practice for heirs abroad — a Brazilian lawyer holding a power of attorney can file within the window with the death certificate and a basic asset list, and complete the file over the following months.
• Extrajudicial (notarial) estates. Here the statutes were written for court filings and the notaries had to be fitted in. The text of the São Paulo surcharge, for instance, speaks of the inventário or arrolamento not being “requerido” within 60 days (Lei 10.705/2000, art. 21, I) — a word written with a court filing in mind, and one that has generated argument about which notarial act counts as the request. We do not cite a particular judgment here, because the point is contested and moves; what matters practically is that the answer is not in the CPC. Other states have their own equivalents — a declaração filed with the state tax authority within the period, or a protocol at the notary — and some have no equivalent at all, which makes the deed date the only date. Confirm before relying on it.
• Pandemic-era rules, and their end. Several states suspended these clocks during 2020. Rio de Janeiro is the instructive case, and it is routinely reported backwards: the suspension came from Lei fluminense nº 8.769/2020, art. 3º, which interrupted the ITD declaration deadlines and suspended the art. 37 penalties for the duration of the state health contingency plan — and Lei nº 9.942/2022 repealed that article, restarting the clocks on its entry into force (30 December 2022) for the estates caught in the window and expressly reinstating the penalties. A pandemic suspension is therefore something to check the end of, not to rely on. Deaths in 2026 are not covered anywhere.

For an heir outside Brazil, the practical rule is: do not wait for the perfect file. A power of attorney signed at the consulate, or signed locally and apostilled, is enough for counsel to perform the state’s recognised opening act inside the window; our guide to inheriting property in Brazil as a non-resident heir walks through the document set.

Speak to counsel — the stopping act is state and route specific. Whether a notarial nomination, a tax declaration, or only a court petition stops the clock in your state is not written in the CPC. Have Brazilian counsel confirm the recognised act for the state and route before assuming you are inside the window.

How big is the ITCMD surcharge in each state?

How this table was built, and why some cells are blank. For this guide we read the current consolidated text of each state’s own ITCMD statute on that state’s legislative-assembly or tax-authority website. Where we could read the statute, the row gives the rule and the article it comes from. Where we could not reach the state’s own text, we print no number at all — the compilations that circulate among practitioners disagree on several states, and a wrong percentage under a law firm’s name is worse than an admitted gap. Two cautions apply to every row: the figures are percentages of the tax, not of the estate; and state ITCMD statutes are being rewritten now for the LC 227/2026 transition, so treat even a verified row as a starting point for a conversation, never as a computation.

State	Surcharge for opening the inventário late	Read from
Acre (AC)	Not confirmed for this guide	— confirm with SEFAZ-AC
Alagoas (AL)	20% of the tax where the inventário and partition is requested more than 2 months after the opening of the succession — expressly due “mesmo se recolhido no prazo”, i.e. even where the tax itself was paid on time. The 30-day trigger in the 1989 text was replaced in 2016.	Lei nº 5.077/1989 (CTE-AL), art. 177, §1º (redação da Lei nº 7.861/2016)
Amapá (AP)	Not confirmed for this guide	— confirm with SEFAZ-AP
Amazonas (AM)	10% of the tax where the judicial or notarial inventário is opened more than 60 days after the opening of the succession, rising to 20% where the delay exceeds 120 days.	Lei Complementar estadual nº 19/1997, art. 136-B, I (incluído pela LC nº 103/2012)
Bahia (BA)	5% of the tax where the inventário or arrolamento is not requested within 60 days of the opening of the succession, independently of whether the tax itself was paid on time. Reductions of 70% / 35% / 25% apply by timing (art. 13-A). There is no further tier at 180 days — a claim that circulates but has no basis in the text.	Lei nº 4.826/1989, art. 13, I (redação da Lei nº 10.847/2007)
Ceará (CE)	10% of the tax for delay in requesting the inventário or arrolamento beyond the period set by the CPC, rising to 20% when the delay exceeds 180 days. Note the statute pegs the deadline to “o prazo previsto na legislação processual civil” — the 2 months of CPC art. 611 — not to 60 days; the “60 days” often quoted for Ceará belongs to the parallel rule for doações in art. 35.	Lei nº 15.812/2015, art. 34, I
Distrito Federal (DF)	None in force. The DF did enact a 20% surcharge for failing to open the estate “dentro de prazo legal” — in February 2015 — and revoked it in October of the same year. Nothing else in the DF statute keys a fine to the opening date.	Lei nº 3.804/2006, art. 11-A, revogado pelo art. 2º da Lei nº 5.549/2015
Espírito Santo (ES)	10% of the tax, as an additional fine, where the judicial or extrajudicial inventário is requested more than 60 days after the opening of the succession — due “ainda que o recolhimento tenha sido efetuado no prazo”.	Lei nº 10.011/2013, art. 16, §2º
Goiás (GO)	No surcharge on the inventário itself. Goiás fines the ITCD declaration: 10% of the tax where the DITCD is delivered more than 60 days late, and 20% where it is more than 120 days late. The declaration is itself due within 60 days of the death, so the delay periods run on top of that deadline. Goiás did have a late-inventário fine, but only between 2001 and 2007.	Lei nº 11.651/1991 (CTE-GO), art. 89, I e I-A; IN GSE nº 1.564/2023, art. 3, I
Maranhão (MA)	Not confirmed for this guide — the state’s own legislation service was unreachable	— confirm with SEFAZ-MA
Mato Grosso (MT)	5% of the tax where a judicial inventário or arrolamento is not opened within 120 days of the death, 10% where the delay exceeds 240 days. For an extrajudicial estate the same tiers run instead to the date the estate is filed with SEFAZ-MT. Older texts circulating online (30 days/10%, or 60 days/10%) are superseded.	Lei nº 7.850/2002, art. 25, I e I-A (redação da Lei nº 10.488/2016)
Mato Grosso do Sul (MS)	20% of the tax where the inventário is requested more than 2 months after the opening of the succession. The reduction in §2º is procedural, not a prompt-payment discount: the fine drops to 20% of its own value where the debt is settled before the assessment notice is drawn up, with further tiers after that. The “60 days” often quoted was the rule only between 2013 and October 2023.	Lei nº 1.810/1997 (CTE-MS), art. 135, §§1º e 2º (redação da Lei nº 6.124/2023)
Minas Gerais (MG)	None today. MG’s late-opening fine (10% after 90 days, 20% after 120) was revoked in 2007, and sources still quoting it are quoting dead law. MG instead runs a payment clock — 180 days from death — and fines a missing or false declaration at 20%.	Lei nº 14.941/2003, art. 27 (revogado pela Lei nº 17.272/2007); arts. 13, I e 25
Pará (PA)	Not confirmed for this guide	— confirm with SEFA-PA
Paraíba (PB)	10% of the tax where the inventário or arrolamento is opened more than 180 days after the death. The 60-day trigger that most compilations still show was replaced in August 2024; the percentage did not change.	Lei nº 5.123/1989, art. 19 (redação da Lei nº 13.347/2024)
Paraná (PR)	None. The penalties chapter of the PR statute is keyed to non-payment and to declaration conduct; nothing attaches to the date the inventário was opened. Tax is due before the notarial deed, or within 30 days of the trânsito em julgado of the judicial decision.	Lei nº 18.573/2015, arts. 25 e 31–34; Resolução SEFA nº 1.527/2015
Pernambuco (PE)	None. This is the state most often reported wrongly. PE has no fine for opening the estate late. The 30% figure often quoted was a penalty for requesting the tax assessment late, and it was revoked with effect from 1 January 2026; the 90% figure is the penalty for non-payment found in an ex officio fiscal procedure. Neither is a late-inventário fine.	Lei nº 13.974/2009, com as alterações da Lei Complementar estadual nº 563/2025 (Anexo 2, art. 20)
Piauí (PI)	10% of the tax where the inventário or arrolamento is not requested within 60 days of the opening of the succession, applied independently of any notice.	Lei nº 4.261/1989, art. 25, I (redação da Lei nº 6.744/2015)
Rio de Janeiro (RJ)	10% of the tax where the judicial inventário and partition is not requested within 2 months of the opening of the succession — charged at double (20%) where the omission is found during a fiscal procedure. Flat: no annual escalation. Separately, failing to file the ITD declaration within the art. 27, §4 deadlines carries 10% plus 10 percentage points for each additional 12 months, capped at 40%, or 80% when found in a fiscal procedure. Fines are reduced 50% / 20% / 10% by timing (art. 37, §2).	Lei nº 7.174/2015, art. 37, V (opening) and art. 37, I (declaration), art. 27, §4
Rio Grande do Norte (RN)	Not confirmed for this guide — the state tax authority’s site was unreachable, and we will not assert the absence of a fine on that basis	— confirm with SET-RN
Rio Grande do Sul (RS)	None. The RS statute has no infractions-and-penalties chapter at all; it applies the state’s general tax-procedure law to late payment only. The 10%/20% ladder some practitioners still cite for RS has no basis in the legislation.	Lei nº 8.821/1989 (arts. 21 e 28); Decreto nº 33.156/1989
Rondônia (RO)	Not confirmed for this guide	— confirm with SEFIN-RO
Roraima (RR)	Not confirmed for this guide	— confirm with SEFAZ-RR
Santa Catarina (SC)	20% of the tax for failing to open the inventário or partition proceeding “dentro de prazo legal”. The statute does not itself state a number of days — the period is the 2 months of CPC art. 611.	Lei nº 13.136/2004, art. 13, I, “a” (redação da Lei nº 14.967/2009)
São Paulo (SP)	10% of the tax where the inventário or arrolamento is not requerido within 60 days of the opening of the succession; 20% where the delay exceeds 180 days.	Lei nº 10.705/2000, art. 21, I
Sergipe (SE)	Not confirmed for this guide	— confirm with SEFAZ-SE
Tocantins (TO)	No surcharge on the inventário itself. Tocantins fines late delivery of the ITCD Declaration: 10% of the tax where the delay exceeds 60 days and reaches 180, and 20% beyond 180 days, halved if paid within the period stated in the notice (art. 65). The older rule keyed to the inventário not being opened was revoked in 2015.	Lei nº 1.287/2001 (CTE-TO), art. 64, I, “a” e “b”, e art. 65 (redação da Lei nº 3.019/2015)

Nineteen of the twenty-seven rows above were read from the state’s current statute. What they show is that the received wisdom on this topic is unreliable in a specific and consistent way: several states fine something other than the inventário. Goiás and Tocantins fine a late tax declaration. Pernambuco fines a late assessment request and non-payment. Rio de Janeiro’s famous escalating ladder is its declaration fine, not its opening fine, which is a flat 10%. Four states we checked — Minas Gerais, Paraná, Rio Grande do Sul, and the Federal District — plus Pernambuco impose no opening surcharge at all, though each still runs a payment clock with interest.

The trigger periods are also less uniform than the “sixty days” everyone repeats. Verified triggers range from 60 days (SP, ES, AM, PI, BA), through 2 months as the statute’s own words (AL, MS, RJ, SC via CPC art. 611), to 120 days (MT) and 180 days (PB). Among verified states the heaviest opening surcharge is 20% (SC, AL, MS); the lightest is 5% (BA, and MT’s first tier); and São Paulo’s 10%/20% ladder is the most-copied design.

Legal basis: the verified figures come from the current consolidated texts of the statutes named in the right-hand column, read on the relevant state assembly or state tax-authority site; the URLs are in the Sources section at the end of this guide.

Speak to counsel — and treat a blank cell as a real gap, not a zero. A row marked not confirmed for this guide means only that we did not read that state’s current statute ourselves; it does not mean the state has no surcharge. For any estate in one of those states, have Brazilian counsel obtain the current text from the state tax authority before you budget.

What is the difference between the opening penalty and the payment penalty?

Two clocks, two penalties — and heirs abroad pay both when they confuse them.

The opening clock is the one in the table above: a surcharge triggered by when the proceeding was started. It is assessed once, as a percentage of the tax, and its tier is fixed by the date of the opening act.

The payment clock is separate: the state’s deadline for paying the ITCMD itself. Miss it and the ordinary consequences of late tax payment follow — interest (most states index to the SELIC rate, with a floor) and a late-payment fine that accrues daily or monthly. São Paulo is the clean illustration. Under Lei 10.705/2000, art. 17, the tax is due within 30 days of the decision homologating the calculation or of the order directing payment; art. 17, §1 adds that the payment period “não poderá ser superior a 180 (cento e oitenta) dias da abertura da sucessão” — but with an express carve-out where a judge extends the period for good cause, which is often the point that saves a slow estate. Beyond the applicable date, art. 19 imposes a fine of 0.33% per day of delay, capped at 20%, and art. 20 adds SELIC-based interest with a floor of 1% per month — all on top of any art. 21 opening surcharge.

Other states design the payment clock differently, sometimes more generously. Minas Gerais gives 180 days from death (Lei 14.941/2003, art. 13, I) and grants a 15% discount for payment within 90 days — but the discount lives in the regulation, not the Law (RITCD, Decreto nº 43.981/2005, art. 23), and it is conditional: the Declaração de Bens e Direitos must also be filed inside the same 90 days, or the discount is lost. Paraná requires payment before the notarial deed, or within 30 days of the trânsito em julgado of the decision homologating the calculation or the amicable partition (Lei 18.573/2015, art. 25) — from the decision becoming final, not from the day it is handed down. The lesson: on a long-delayed estate the interest, compounding for years, can exceed the surcharge.

Legal basis: the São Paulo payment deadline, daily fine, and interest are arts. 17, 19 e 20 da Lei paulista nº 10.705/2000; the Minas Gerais 180-day deadline and 90-day discount are in Lei mineira nº 14.941/2003; Paraná’s payment timing is Resolução SEFA-PR nº 1.527/2015.

How much does the surcharge cost in reais — worked examples

Worked illustrations, using only states whose current statute we read (FX ~R$5.4/US$1 in August 2026; illustrative only):

Scenario	ITCMD before penalty	Opening delay	Surcharge	Extra cost
R$1,500,000 apartment in São Paulo (4% assumed)	R$60,000	Requested in month 5 (61–180 days)	10% (art. 21, I)	R$6,000
Same apartment	R$60,000	Requested after 14 months	20% (delay beyond 180 days)	R$12,000 (+ interest on any late payment)
R$800,000 house in Santa Catarina, ~5% blended assumed	~R$40,000	Opened in month 4	20% (art. 13, I, “a”)	~R$8,000
R$800,000 flat in Paraná (4% assumed)	R$32,000	Opened in month 9	none	R$0 surcharge (interest only if paid late)
R$2,000,000 estate in Rio de Janeiro, ~6% blended assumed	~R$120,000	Judicial inventário requested after 2 months, family filed on its own	10% (art. 37, V)	~R$12,000 — but 20%, ≈R$24,000, if the omission surfaces in a tax audit instead

The Rio de Janeiro row carries the most commonly mis-stated rule in this area. RJ’s late-opening surcharge is a flat 10% of the tax, doubled if the state finds the omission during a fiscal procedure. The escalating 10%-per-year ladder up to 40% that circulates online belongs to a different penalty in the same article: the fine for not filing the ITD declaration within the deadlines of art. 27, §4 (art. 37, I) — 10%, plus 10 percentage points for every additional twelve months, capped at 40%, or 80% flat when the omission is found in a fiscal procedure. Both can bite the same estate. The Paraná row shows the opposite pole: in a no-surcharge state, the cost of delay is interest and the decay of the file, not a fixed fine.

Speak to counsel — these numbers assume rates that are changing. São Paulo’s flat 4% is expected to give way to progressive brackets under LC 227/2026 in the 2027 transition, and several states have already moved. Run the actual estate through the current rate table of the specific state; our ITCMD calculator is a first approximation, not a filing.

Can the surcharge be avoided, reduced, or challenged?

There are five recognised paths, none universal:

1. Open inside the window on a thin file. By far the cheapest. Counsel with a power of attorney performs the recognised opening act — court petition, notarial nomination, tax declaration — before day 60, and the estate is completed afterwards. For a non-resident heir this typically requires only a death certificate, identity documents, and the POA; the CPF and translations can follow.
2. Use the state’s own reduction rules. Bahia (Lei 4.826/1989, art. 13-A) reduces the fine by 70% if it is paid within 30 days of the intimação do lançamento de ofício, 35% if paid before inscription in the state’s dívida ativa, and 25% if paid before the enforcement action is filed — with payment implying withdrawal of any challenge. Rio de Janeiro (Lei 7.174/2015, art. 37, §2) reduces its fines by 50% for payment within 30 days of notice of the assessment, 20% within 30 days of the first-instance ruling, and 10% within 30 days of the second-instance ruling, conditional on withdrawing the challenge and settling the tax first. These are automatic if the timing is met — the estate does not need to litigate.
3. Dispute the counting of the clock. Where the state’s rule was written for court filings, notarial estates have won arguments that the notarial opening act — not the deed date — stops the clock (the São Paulo line of decisions on art. 21). Some estates have also argued that the clock cannot run against heirs who could not know of the death; results are mixed and fact-dependent.
4. Invoke a suspension. Pandemic-era suspensions covered 2020 deaths in some states; occasional state amnesties (programas de regularização) temporarily waive or reduce ITCMD penalties for estates that regularise within a window. Watch for them, but never plan on one.
5. Argue proportionality. In October 2024 the STF fixed, in Tema 863 (RE 736.090), that until a federal complementary law says otherwise a qualified tax fine — one imposed for evasion, fraud, or collusion — is capped at 100% of the tax debt, rising to 150% only on statutory recidivism. That is no help against a 10–20% opening surcharge, but it is the frame within which the heaviest audit-triggered tiers are argued.

What does not work: waiting for sibling consensus before anyone acts, or assuming a foreign probate satisfies the Brazilian window — for assets situated in Brazil, Brazilian jurisdiction is exclusive under CPC art. 23, II.

Legal basis: the reduction schedule for Bahia is art. 13 da Lei baiana nº 4.826/1989 (as amended by Lei nº 10.847/2007); the exclusivity of Brazilian jurisdiction over Brazilian-situs assets is art. 23, II, do CPC/2015.

What are the non-tax costs of a late inventário?

The surcharge is the visible cost. For heirs abroad, the invisible costs are usually larger:

• Frozen assets. Bank accounts are blocked on notice of death; rent cannot be lawfully collected without an inventariante; the property cannot be sold. A year of vacancy and condominium fees on a São Paulo apartment routinely exceeds the São Paulo surcharge.
• Cascading estates. When an heir dies before the partition, their own heirs step in, and the first estate must accommodate a second — more POAs, more documents, more consensus to find.
• Document decay. Certificates expire, witnesses move, branches close. Locating the assets of someone who died ten years ago is a forensic project; our guides on international inheritance and estate division cover the recovery tools.
• Possession disputes. The relative living in the house for five years starts to feel like an owner, and Brazilian law recognises adverse possession (usucapião) in some configurations, even between co-heirs in narrow cases.

None of these is a fine. All of them are why counsel advise opening within the window even in a state with no surcharge.

What should an heir abroad do in the first sixty days?

A sequence that respects the window without requiring travel:

Week	Action	Why it matters for the deadline
1	Obtain the Brazilian death certificate (certidão de óbito); if the death occurred abroad, start the consular transcription	Every opening act needs it
1–2	Engage Brazilian counsel; sign a power of attorney at the consulate or locally with apostille	Counsel performs the opening act on the POA — you do not need to be present
2–3	Apply for a CPF for each non-resident heir	Needed to be named in the estate and pay the tax; obtainable from abroad
2–4	List known assets (property matrículas, bank accounts, vehicles, company shares) — even incomplete	A basic list suffices to open; sobrepartilha handles what is found later
3–6	Counsel performs the opening act recognised in the state (court petition / notarial nomination / tax declaration)	Stops the surcharge clock
6–12	Apostilled, sworn-translated kinship documents follow; route (judicial vs notarial) is confirmed; ITCMD calculated and paid within the state’s payment deadline	Avoids the second clock

Where the family already knows it will sell, the same POA should cover the sale and the remittance; our guide on selling your share through a cessão de direitos hereditários covers exiting before the partition. Where the estate is only a bank balance or a small sum, the alvará judicial may replace the inventário entirely.

Hypothetical illustration — not a real client.

Imagine a man in Toronto whose Brazilian father dies in Goiânia in early March, leaving a house in Goiás and a savings account at a São Paulo bank. He decides to wait until his July holiday to “sort it out in person”. When he arrives, counsel explains two separate problems. Goiás does not fine the late inventário — it fines the late ITCD declaration, and that declaration was due within 60 days of the death; the delay is now long enough to have crossed both the 10% and the 20% tiers. Separately, the bank balance sits under São Paulo’s own regime, whose surcharge attaches to the estate not being requerido within 60 days, and whose payment clock has its own limit measured from the death. Two states, two different triggers, and neither of them the one he assumed. A power of attorney signed at the Toronto consulate in March would have let counsel meet both deadlines without him leaving Canada.

Every distinguishing detail here is invented. Real situations turn on their own facts, dates, and documents, and require individual analysis. Nothing in this example predicts any outcome.

What are the most common mistakes?

• Treating the CPC deadline as the penalty. The Code fines nothing; the state does.
• Assuming one rule for the whole country. Twenty-seven regimes.
• Confusing the opening clock with the payment clock. Opening on time and paying late still costs interest and a daily fine.
• Waiting for family consensus or the perfect file before opening. Counsel can open on a POA and a death certificate.
• Assuming a foreign probate stops the Brazilian clock. It does not.
• Ignoring the second state. Property in one state and a domicile in another means two penalty regimes.
• Planning on an amnesty or a pandemic rule. Never guaranteed for your dates.

The deadline at a glance

Question	Answer	Where
National opening deadline	2 months from death; 12 months to conclude; judge may extend	CPC art. 611
Procedural penalty	None	CPC (silent)
Fiscal penalty	State-by-state surcharge on the ITCMD, upheld by the STF	Súmula 542 STF; state ITCMD statutes
Most common design	A 10% / 20% ladder keyed to the length of the delay (SP, CE, AM)	State statutes
Harshest verified	20% (SC, AL, MS)	e.g. Lei SC 13.136/2004, art. 13, I, “a”
Mildest verified	5% (BA, reducible 70/35/25%; MT’s first tier)	Lei BA 4.826/1989, arts. 13 e 13-A
No opening surcharge (verified)	MG, PR, RS, PE, DF	State statutes
Fined instead: the tax declaration	GO, TO, RJ’s second penalty, MG, PE	State statutes
Verified trigger periods	60 days · “2 months” · 120 days · 180 days — not one national figure	State statutes
Separate payment clock	Yes in every state — interest and late-payment fine	e.g. Lei SP 10.705/2000, arts. 17, 19, 20
Stops the clock	Court petition; in some states a notarial nomination or a tax declaration	State rules and case law

Key terms

• Abertura da sucessão — the opening of the succession, at the moment of death (CC art. 1.784).
• Inventário — the estate proceeding, judicial or notarial.
• Inventariante — the estate administrator; the notarial nomination of one can be the “opening act” in some states.
• ITCMD / ITCD / ITD — the state inheritance and gift tax, under its various state names.
• Multa — fine or surcharge; multa por atraso na abertura (late-opening surcharge) vs multa de mora (late-payment fine).
• Declaração do ITCMD — the tax declaration some states require within a fixed period after death, independently of the court.
• Juros de mora — interest on late payment, usually indexed to SELIC.
• Sobrepartilha — the supplementary partition for assets found after the estate closed.

Key takeaways

• Article 611 of the CPC sets a 2-month opening window and a 12-month conclusion window, both extendable, and attaches no fine of its own.
• The penalty is state law. Most states surcharge the ITCMD when the estate is opened late; the STF has upheld such fines (Súmula 542).
• Designs vary widely, and not in the way most compilations report. Of the nineteen states whose current statutes we read: a 10%/20% ladder in São Paulo, Ceará and Amazonas; 20% in Santa Catarina, Alagoas and Mato Grosso do Sul; a flat 10% (doubled on audit) in Rio de Janeiro; 10% in Espírito Santo, Piauí and Paraíba; 5% rising to 10% in Mato Grosso; 5% in Bahia — and no opening surcharge at all in Minas Gerais, Paraná, Rio Grande do Sul, Pernambuco and the Federal District.
• Several states fine something else entirely. Goiás and Tocantins fine a late ITCD declaration, not a late inventário; Pernambuco’s much-quoted percentages are an assessment-request penalty (now repealed) and a non-payment penalty; Rio de Janeiro’s famous 10%-to-40% escalator is its declaration fine, not its opening fine.
• The trigger period is not always 60 days. Verified triggers run from 60 days through “2 months” to 120 days (Mato Grosso) and 180 days (Paraíba, changed only in 2024).
• The surcharge is a percentage of the tax, not of the estate; interest on late payment is a separate cost.
• Opening is not concluding. Counsel can perform the opening act on a power of attorney with a thin file.
• Heirs abroad are structurally exposed — and protected by the same tool: a consular POA signed in week one.
• Late is expensive; never is worse. Frozen assets, cascading estates, and possession disputes cost more than any surcharge.
• Confirm every figure against the current state statute — the LC 227/2026 transition is rewriting ITCMD laws now, and where our table says not confirmed, treat it as an open question rather than a zero.

Related guides on this site

• Inheriting property in Brazil as a non-resident heir
• Brazil’s ITCMD inheritance tax and the 2027 reform
• Alvará judicial: releasing bank balances and small estates without a full inventário
• Cessão de direitos hereditários: selling your share of a Brazilian inheritance
• How estates are divided among heirs in Brazil
• International inheritance in Brazil
• Capital gains for non-residents selling inherited Brazilian property

How ZS Advogados can help

The deadline problem for an heir abroad is a logistics problem with a legal shape: the opening act has to happen in Brazil, in the right state, in the right form, within a window that started before the family knew there was a window — while the documents are still crossing an ocean.

Our team handles estates for heirs outside Brazil through a power of attorney: performing the recognised opening act within the window, computing the ITCMD under the current law of the specific state, testing the notarial route, and completing the file in parallel rather than in sequence. Where the window has already closed, we quantify the surcharge, check the state’s reduction rules and the counting of the clock, and move the estate forward. Our probate for heirs abroad page describes the remote engagement; the ITCMD calculator gives a first estimate of the tax the surcharge would apply to.

• Family law — the inventário itself, judicial or notarial, and the partition
• International law — consular powers of attorney, apostilles, remote representation, remittance of proceeds
• Tax law — ITCMD computation, surcharges, reductions, and the LC 227/2026 transition

Book a consultation to have the estate’s deadline position, the applicable state rules, and the fastest opening act reviewed before the window closes.

Technical review by the ZS Advogados Associados team, including co-founding partner Karina Peres Silvério (OAB/SP 331.050) and founding partner Zachariah Zagol (OAB/SP 351.356). Contact: contato@zsassociados.com — +55 (18) 3908-1653 — Presidente Prudente, SP.

Sources and legal basis

• Lei nº 13.105/2015 — Código de Processo Civil (arts. 23, 611, 659–667) (Planalto)
• Lei nº 10.406/2002 — Código Civil (art. 1.784, succession opens at death) (Planalto)
• Súmula nº 542 do STF — state fines for delay in starting or finishing the inventário (STF)
• STF, Tema 863 (RE 736.090) — ceiling on qualified tax fines (STF)
• Emenda Constitucional nº 132/2023 — tax reform; ITCMD (Planalto)
• Lei Complementar nº 227, de 13 de janeiro de 2026 — ITCMD general rules (arts. 148, 155, 156, 158, 159) (Planalto)
• Lei paulista nº 10.705/2000 — ITCMD-SP, texto compilado; arts. 6º, 17, 19, 20, 21 (ALESP)
• SEFAZ-SP — valores da UFESP (Comunicado DICAR-88/25: R$ 38,42 para 2026)
• Lei fluminense nº 7.174/2015 — ITD-RJ, texto em vigor com alterações; arts. 27, 30, 37 (ALERJ)
• Lei fluminense nº 8.769/2020, art. 3º (pandemic suspension), revoked by Lei nº 9.942/2022 (ALERJ)
• Lei mineira nº 14.941/2003 — ITCD-MG, texto atualizado; arts. 13, 25, 27 (revogado) (ALMG)
• Decreto mineiro nº 43.981/2005 — RITCD-MG, art. 23 (15% discount) (ALMG)
• Lei paranaense nº 18.573/2015 — ITCMD-PR, arts. 25, 31–34 (SEFA-PR)
• Resolução SEFA-PR nº 1.527/2015 — ITCMD-PR, texto compilado (SEFANET-PR)
• Lei catarinense nº 13.136/2004 — ITCMD-SC, art. 13 (ALESC)
• Lei gaúcha nº 8.821/1989 — ITCD-RS, texto consolidado (SEFAZ-RS)
• Lei pernambucana nº 13.974/2009 — ICD-PE, texto consolidado (SEFAZ-PE)
• Lei baiana nº 4.826/1989 — ITD-BA, arts. 13 e 13-A (SEFAZ-BA)
• Lei goiana nº 11.651/1991 — Código Tributário Estadual, art. 89 (Economia-GO)
• Instrução Normativa GSE nº 1.564/2023 — prazo da Declaração do ITCD-GO (Economia-GO)
• Lei cearense nº 15.812/2015 — ITCD-CE, arts. 33 e 34 (ALECE)
• Lei alagoana nº 5.077/1989 — CTE-AL, art. 177, §1º (SEFAZ-AL)
• Lei Complementar amazonense nº 19/1997 — art. 136-B (SEFAZ-AM, SILT multivigente)
• Lei capixaba nº 10.011/2013 — ITCMD-ES, art. 16, §2º (SEFAZ-ES)
• Lei distrital nº 3.804/2006 — ITCD-DF; art. 11-A revogado (SINJ-DF)
• Lei distrital nº 5.549/2015 — art. 2º, que revoga o art. 11-A (SINJ-DF)
• Lei mato-grossense nº 7.850/2002 — ITCD-MT, art. 25, I e I-A (SEFAZ-MT)
• Lei sul-mato-grossense nº 1.810/1997 — CTE-MS, art. 135 (Governo de MS)
• Lei paraibana nº 5.123/1989 — ITCD-PB, art. 19, texto consolidado (SEFAZ-PB)
• Lei piauiense nº 6.744/2015 — nova redação do art. 25, I da Lei nº 4.261/1989 (ALEPI)
• Lei tocantinense nº 1.287/2001 — CTE-TO, arts. 64 e 65, texto consolidado (SEFAZ-TO)

---

This guide is for informational and educational purposes only, in line with Provimento No. 205/2021 of the Brazilian Bar Association (OAB). It is not legal or tax advice, an opinion, or an offer of services, does not refer to any specific case, and does not guarantee any result. It describes Brazilian law and practice; references to foreign probate and documents are factual context only. ITCMD rates, payment deadlines, and penalty rules are set by each state, differ across all 27 units of the federation, and are in active transition under EC 132/2023 and LC 227/2026 — every figure in the state table must be confirmed against the statute in force at the relevant date. Rules and provisions are cited as of August 2026; changes after that date are not reflected. Each situation requires individual analysis by a licensed attorney. Last updated August 2026.